" But times have changed, and advocates of disclosure today have moved beyond election-related spending to insist on disclosure of a wide range of spending with only the barest of connections to politics. Today's disclosure demands would instead bring to public light dues paid to professional and trade associations as well as donations to private social welfare organizations that are not intended for campaign spending.
After casually suggesting hypocrisy on the part of opponents of radically expanded disclosure, the article starts to get really bad. Consider:
For corporations, trade associations, and politically active nonprofits, secretive political spending carries significant practical and reputational risks."
Column laments privacy, demands more disclosure -- CCP response to Eliza Newlin Carney's praise of discolsure
Allison Hayward talks campaign finance with state AGs
C-Span has the video.
CATO, and Center for Competitive Politics, Will File Amici Curiae Briefs in Arizona Public Funding Case in U.S. Supreme Court
"CATO, a well-known libertarian think-tank, and the Center for Competitive Politics, have both received permission to file amici curiae briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v Bennett, 10-238. This is the case that challenges extra public funding for certain candidates in the Arizona system of public funding for candidates."
CCP's Sean Parnell: A modern campaign finance reform agenda for the next Congress
"Despite the fact that America’s political system thrived in 2010, predictable calls to return to the old way of regulating political speech persist. Advocates for the antiquated system of speech regulation rely on a worldview where only politicians, the media, and a few favored interests should have a meaningful say in politics and campaigns."
CCP releases post-2010 policy agenda
"The Center for Competitive Politics (CCP) released an agenda today, 'After 2010: A Modern Agenda for Campaign Finance Reform,' which outlines steps policymakers can take to increase incentives for citizen participation in politics, encourage electoral competition and simplify the maze of campaign finance regulations.
'After the failure of the DISCLOSE Act, which inflamed partisan tensions, this reform agenda offers a way forward for the next Congress to overhaul campaign finance law while respecting First Amendment rights,' said Bradley A. Smith, the chairman of the Center for Competitive Politics and a former FEC chairman."
This Year in Campaign Financing -- Interview with Center for Competitive Politics VP Allison Hayward
LOPEZ: Should the tea party care about this report?
HAYWARD: Absolutely. It is the ad hoc, grassroots groups that have the most to fear from campaign-finance regulations as we presently practice them. They’re complicated, nonintuitive, and a real pain for compliance. And those who would regulate more are targeting “outside” groups for additional restrictions. I put quotes around “outside” because this is one expression that drives me nuts. What are “outside groups” outside of? Isn’t the political process the way everybody debates and decides what leadership and representation they want?"
You Are Now Free to Speak About Politics - Reason Magazine
Senate Democrats Ask for Tighter Rules on Foreign Money in Campaigns
“Federal law and FEC regulations already mandate ample restrictions, including a prohibition on foreign nationals playing any role in political spending decisions,” she said. “This is a manufactured conspiracy theory unjustified by any showing of a real problem.”"
Senate Democrats Ask for Tighter Rules on Foreign Money in Campaigns
“Federal law and FEC regulations already mandate ample restrictions, including a prohibition on foreign nationals playing any role in political spending decisions,” she said. “This is a manufactured conspiracy theory unjustified by any showing of a real problem.”"
Campaign finance reform: R.I.P.?
Only a decade ago, the campaign finance movement achieved one of its greatest victories: the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which reformers saw as a foundation they would build upon in the years ahead."
Brad Smith: Chambergate, and the unwittingly radical reach of reform
Professor Richard Hasen argues that all these questions would go away - or at least be alleviated - if the FEC merely had the power to conduct random audits of political actors. Now, during my time as FEC Commissioner and Chairman, I publicy favored (and still do) giving the FEC the power to conduct random audits of political committees (others at CCP do not). But Professor Hasen's proposal goes far beyond that.Professor Hasen appears to want the FEC to have the authority to conduct random audits of any political actor or speaker. That is, he makes no distinction between political committees, i.e. the parties and candidate campaigns, and PACs that contribute directly to candidates, and any American citizen or group of citizens that chooses to exercise its Constitutional rights to make independent political expenditures."
News Links 09/24/2010 (a.m.)
-
72 Hours: The New Normal — Sunlight Foundation Blog
In a few years, the 72 hour rule has gone from a perennial complaint to a serious leadership issue — the sort of attention the issue deserves.
Over the last year, Speaker Pelosi has repeatedly committed to posting major legislation online before floor consideration, and stuck by those promises. 72 hours online has become the new normal.
CBS News has apparently posted an advance draft of the House GOP platform, with some 72 hour language:
Read The Bill:We will ensure that bills are debated and discussed in the public square by publishing the text online for at least three days before coming up for a vote in the House of Representatives.No more hiding legislative language from the minority party, opponents, and the public.Legislation should be understood by all interested parties before it is voted on. -
Much recent evidence on both sides in the lawsuit against “top-two” in Washington state can be seen at the Washington Secretary of State’s web page. See here.
-
Rep. Brady Opening Statement on Fair Elections Now Markup
“Today we mark up H.R. 6116, the “Fair Elections Now Act,” sponsored by Rep. Larson of Connecticut. The Fair Elections Now Act is a voluntary program and would allow qualified House candidates to run for office utilizing a blend of contributions from small dollar donors and limited public matching funds. It is designed to change the current system of campaign fundraising which largely relies on large donors and special interests. It does not limit or discourage spending by outside groups, but instead aims to ensure that those voices are not the only ones that can get heard in public debate. It’s about encouraging more speech, not less.”
-
Outside groups spending record amounts on mid-term elections - Sunlight Foundation Reporting Group
Since January 2010, spending by outside organizations to influence congressional elections totals some $57 million--up more than $20 million from a comparable time period in 2006, the most recent non-presidential election cycle--according to reports collected by the Federal Election Commission.
tags: campaign finance citizens united independent expenditures FEC
-
House Administration Committee Passes Public Funding Bill for U.S. House Candidates
On September 23, the U.S. House of Representatives Administration Committee passed HR6116, the bill to provide public funding for candidates for U.S. House. Candidates who raise at least $50,000 from voters in their state (not their district) qualify.
-
Senate sponsors of the DISCLOSE Act made clear to Senators Snowe and Collins that they were prepared to change the bill to strip it down to the disclosure provisions, to make 2011 the effective date for the disclosure reforms and to discuss any other changes the Senators wanted to make.
Yet, Senators Snowe and Collins were not even willing to discuss with the sponsors of the legislation changes in the bill to address any problems they may have. -
DISCLOSE Act redo fails to pass procedural test » Newsroom » Center for Competitive Politics
"The DISCLOSE Act was not a serious attempt at campaign finance reform," said Center for Competitive Politics Chairman Bradley A. Smith, a former Federal Election Commission Chairman. "This bill was written behind closed doors by the majority party to benefit incumbents. Democratic leaders made no serious attempt to pass a bipartisan bill, writing a bill that silences businesses groups while leaving labor unions largely unfettered."
-
Daily Herald | Rauschenberger wins case to stay on ballot
The Illinois Supreme Court Wednesday upheld the Elgin Republican's position on a primary ballot to reclaim his old state Senate seat - the same day it first heard arguments on the case. A written opinion is expected to follow in the coming weeks.
Supreme court spokesman Joseph Tybor said the quick turnaround was unusual for the court, but that the decision was expedited because of the upcoming Nov. 2 election.
The case centers around a 2009 vote Rauschenberger placed in the local Democratic primary to support his sister, Carol Rauschenberger
Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
News Links 05/28/2010
In Nevada, Squawks Over Chicken Costumes at Polls - NYTimes.com
Disclosing the Meekness of the "DISCLOSE" Bill | CommonDreams.org
Initiative in California Would Change How It Votes - NYTimes.com
On June 8, voters will decide the fate of a ballot measure that would replace traditional primaries in state and Congressional elections with, effectively, two rounds of voting. All candidates would run in the first round, and the top two vote-getters — regardless of party affiliation, or unaffiliation — would then face each other in the general election. Voters’ ultimate choice could be two Republicans or two Democrats, or two candidates with high name recognition, or deep pockets, or populist appeal.
Political donations from business sector down from 2008 elections
"A weak economy has led to an unusual decrease in the money that corporations and their employees are directing toward congressional campaigns and political parties this election cycle. "
House Won’t Consider DISCLOSE Act Until After Recess - Roll Call
"House Rules Committee postponed a Thursday afternoon hearing to finalize the DISCLOSE Act."
FEC Deadlocks on Soft Money - The Eye (CQ Politics)
"Today's 3-3 vote - split along party lines - offered even more ambiguity as to whether candidates and members of Congress should be allowed to raise money for separate nonprofits including ballot initiative committees that exceed $20,000. "
Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
News Links 07/02/2009
Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
The Supreme Court parlor game begins » Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog/detail/the-supreme-court-parlor-game-begins